Beware of scammers impersonating Crystal Intelligence

MiCAR insights | April 23, 2024

MiCAR in Berlin: Key Insights into EU Crypto Regulations and Compliance

by Crystal Marketing Team

The Berlin MiCAR Roundtable focused on advancing regulatory clarity within the EU’s emerging crypto markets, covering seven key areas: 

NFTs Classification

The discussions emphasized the need for precise NFT definitions to avoid misclassification under MiCAR or MiFID. A substance-over-form approach was recommended, focusing on artistic uniqueness, utility, market dynamics, and series issuance. Clear assessment criteria were called for to balance innovation and consumer protection.

Crypto-Assets Classification

Challenges in categorizing crypto-assets under MiCAR and MiFID were highlighted, especially for derivatives like stablecoins. A more nuanced, substance-based regulatory approach was advocated to harmonize classification across the EU, ensuring innovation while minimizing regulatory arbitrage.

Reverse Solicitation

Current ESMA guidelines risk stifling non-commercial activities like education and collaboration by broadening the definition of solicitation. Participants proposed clearer guidelines, class exemptions, and a risk-based enforcement strategy to mitigate unintended restrictions. 

Grandfathering Provisions

MiCAR’s transitional measures allow pre-2025 crypto-asset offerings some regulatory leeway. Participants stressed the importance of clear strategies to align marketing communications with new regulations while ensuring seamless compliance post-deadline.

Grandfathering under Article 143

The transitional regime allows certain crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) to operate until 2026 or pending authorization. Participants urged harmonized EU guidelines and proactive support to CASPs navigating these ambiguous provisions.

Transaction History for Privacy Coins

MiCAR’s requirement for disclosing privacy coin transaction histories poses privacy and practicality challenges. A balanced approach was recommended, limiting disclosure to recent transactions and integrating privacy-enhancing technologies, ensuring compliance with GDPR and AML regulations.  

DeFi Frontend Providers

The role of non-custodial frontends in DeFi platforms was examined, advocating for their exemption from operator classification under MiCAR. Clear legal definitions and industry collaboration were encouraged to prevent undue regulatory burdens while fostering innovation.

The roundtable underscored the importance of fostering dialogue between regulators and the crypto industry, promoting tailored frameworks that support innovation while addressing regulatory objectives. By implementing the outlined recommendations, the EU can establish a robust regulatory environment that balances market integrity with technological growth.  

Read the full report at Validvent

Be the first to get news from Crystal

Compliance | May 7, 2026

What the EU's 20th Russia sanctions package means for crypto compliance

he EU's 20th sanctions package bans Russian crypto platforms and prohibits three assets. Here's what compliance teams need to do now.

Explainers | May 6, 2026

Best Cryptocurrency Transaction Monitoring Platforms 2026

Why is cryptocurrency transaction monitoring under so much pressure right now, and how to find the best solution?

Market Analysis / Research | April 30, 2026

Stablecoin settlement quality bifurcates as USDT crosses 50% organic share

USDT crossed the 50% organic share threshold while USDC remained DeFi-driven. Crystal Foresight examines how stablecoin settlement quality split